| 翻訳と辞書 |
Eric Heinze
Eric Heinze is Professor of Law and Humanities at the School of Law Queen Mary, University of London. He has made contributions in the areas of legal philosophy, justice theory, jurisprudence, and human rights He has also contributed to the law and literature movement.
== Legal Theory ==
In ''The Concept of Injustice'', Heinze examines what he calls the 'classical' style of justice theory, running from Plato to Rawls. Classical justice theorists, Heinze argues, depart from notions of 'injustice' on the seemingly obvious assumption that 'justice' and 'injustice' are logical opposites. For Heinze, 'injustice', in ancient and modern Western languages, is a sheer etymological happenstance. 'Justice' and 'injustice' do appear as opposites within conventional, already pre-defined contexts, in which certain norms are uncritically assumed. Outside of such assumptions, however, the relationship between the two terms becomes far more complex.
In order to overcome that recurring error, Heinze proposes a notion of 'post-classical' justice theory, using literary texts as examples. That project continues Heinze's earlier publications in ''Law & Literature''. In an article〔Adrian Howe, A 'Right to Passions'? Compassion's Sexed Asymmetry and a Minor Comedy of Errors, Law & Critique (2012), vol 23, pp 83-102.〕 in the journal ''Law & Critique'', the feminist scholar (Adrian Howe ) examines how Heinze has innovated within critical theory to offer alternative readings of William Shakespeare. Citing the example of The Comedy of Errors, Howe explains how, well into the 20th century, scholars often thought that Shakespeare would not have sought to convey a serious socio-legal critique in a seemingly frivolous play. Heinze, according to Howe, uncovers a "range of socio-legal dualisms; master–servant, husband–wife, native–alien, parent–child, monarch–parliament, buyer–seller. The Comedy, () argues, deploys concepts of 'comedy' and 'error' to reflect problematic socio-legal relationships that are based on traditional but changing models of socio-legal domination and subordination."〔Adrian Howe, A 'Right to Passions'? Compassion's Sexed Asymmetry and a Minor Comedy of Errors, Law & Critique (2012), vol 23, p.98〕
Howe adds that, on Heinze's reading, "it is the viewpoint of the privileged male that is challenged in the play."〔Adrian Howe, A 'Right to Passions'? Compassion's Sexed Asymmetry and a Minor Comedy of Errors, Law & Critique (2012), vol 23, p.99〕 In ''The Concept of Injustice'', Heinze amplifies those themes. He reviews classical theories of justice, from Plato to Rawls, challenging their assumptions of a seemingly logical opposition between the concepts of 'justice' and 'injustice'.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Eric Heinze」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|